Don't hate the players, hate the game
Tea was when it felt on. Maybe not realistically, on a pitch turning
square and keeping low, with 11 overs until a second new ball and Pat
Cummins bowling like a man who had a date with destiny. Lucky destiny.
It was easiest to believe then. The end just about coming into view,
even though there were 36 overs and over two hours to negotiate for
safety. England only had four wickets left, but one of those was Jos
Buttler who had held firm for 96 deliveries and walking off with him for
the interval was Craig Overton who had seen off 47 himself. Runs were
irrelevant at this point.
England had been in this position before, against this same side albeit
very different personnel. The events of Cardiff in 2009 are still
talked of with great reverence, and refreshers were provided of those
final moments of that battling draw in the lead-up to this series. It
dominated the discussion ahead of day five, too.
Of Collingwood's steel, Anderson and Monty finishing the job amid a
clown car of support staff barreling onto the field with drinks, gloves
and anything else to kill time. A young Bilal Shafayat and a
wardrobe-sized physio, a duo that may as well have been Del Boy and
Rodney as Batman and Robin, a naff Brit-comedy scene tipped over the
edge by Ricky Ponting's turn as unamused villain.
So even when Buttler departed after consuming just 15 more balls, the
late resistance of Overton and man-of-the-moment Jack Leach was
expected. And as they took over an hour out of the game and the threat
of bad light entered into minds if not the equation, Old Trafford found
its voice and willed a repeat. Lord's made them believe. Leeds made them
dream. Manchester could take them higher.
Leach was struck and milked what he could. Off went the helmet, so too
the glasses and out came that lens cloth. A slighter physio arrived on
the scene, flanked by about four extras. Shafayat
otherwise occupied.
The histrionics were just as pronounced. The result was anything but.
The last time England gave up the Ashes on home soil was in 2001 and
since then you could argue that the team and its fans have been spoiled
by 2005, 2009, 2013 and 2015. But it felt like a seminal moment. For the
first time in 18 years, Australia came here with a plan and pulled it
off and England could do nothing to stop them.
During the World Cup, an Australia A side toured the shires, while a
number of individuals called them home for the start of the season,
plying their trade in the County Championship to fully engross
themselves in these conditions. Fitting, then, that a Leach repeat was
nipped in the bud by the leg spin of Glamorgan's Marnus Labuschagne and a
smart catch but Matthew Wade, who played his way into this series with
some off-broadway performances.
It is worth revisiting the events post 2001. What followed was a
reassessment of the domestic structure. Not simply how English cricket
picked their Test side, but a step-up in professionalism brought about
through the introduction of central contracts which, while introduced a
couple of years before those relinquished Ashes, formed a solid
foundation to evoke structural changes.
On the cusp of a new Ashes cycle and the opening throes of the World Test Championship, there is no better time to begin.
Indeed, winning the inaugural WTC and finding a way to succeed in
Australia must form the cornerstones of any performance-related goal.
The strides made in limited-overs cricket since 2015 have made the
format in England relatively self-sufficient, which should hold them in
good stead for next year's T20 World Cup. That same drive must now tilt
back towards the red ball. Within that must come a blueprint for the
Test side. Specifically, what they want in a batting order, before
deciding if those component parts are present in this squad. You can
argue even the senior bats have been bred on indecision.
Jason Roy and Joe Denly's one-to-four swap ahead of this make-or-break
fixture was a gamble unlikely to pay-off, even if Denly held his own in
the second innings for a second fifty in as many Tests. But even the
established are still playing musical chairs.
Joe Root started the summer at four and moved up to three a week later.
Buttler started the Ashes at five and will finish it at seven. As for
Jonny Bairstow, stepping back a few paces gives you the broader picture:
since the start of 2018, he has batted in every position between three
and seven. Moeen Ali, with turns in each of one to nine remains the
poster boy for modern English Test indecision.
One particular reason for the bigger players having to jump around has
been how hard newcomers have found it to bed into the system. Roy is the
latest but he certainly won't be the last.
The team environment is not so much of a factor because this group are a
pretty welcoming bunch. However, changes such as the move by the ECB in
2015 to award incremental contracts instead of allowing players to earn
them has created unnecessary jeopardy among those looking to break into
the Test side, especially as batsmen. The two players currently in
possession of incremental contracts are both bowlers: Tom Curran and
Jofra Archer.
Previously, an uncontracted player could earn an incremental deal by
accruing 20 points of a year-long period, starting on October 1, through
either playing Tests (five points), ODIs or T20Is (two points each). It
offered stability and a degree of comfort. There was no looking over
your shoulder. And it meant there was no great financial disparity
between you and the person sat next to you in the changing room. It may
seem trivial, but being an outlier when it comes to wage can be as
isolating as a loss of form.
Perhaps one thing that does not need to change is the captain. Because
the issues Root has stem from the above factors. Also, and this is no
feather in his cap - there are simply no alternatives.
As much as you can laud the tactical nous of the game's most successful
captains, it's no coincidence they led world-beating sides. Now,
England aren't exactly going to take a page out of Marvel's book and
just throw a few superheroes together and see what sticks. But they can -
indeed, must - address issues that have left them with a mishmash of
misfit talents.
It is always about this time, with an urn gone, when big reactions are
called for or discouraged. And while changes are needed, they must be
done with a focus to rectify a system that has left the Test side in
such a mess. They do not just need a new direction but a new identity
altogether.
The players may have spurned the Ashes across the 18 days of cricket.
But the system had set them up for a fall long before. No amount of
interjections or Bilal Shafayat could have prevented that.

Post a Comment